Live on Tuesdays at 5pm Pacific time - UnSpun #081:
Colin Flaherty joins us tonight.
Colin Flaherty is an award winning reporter and author of the #1 best selling book Don’t Make the Black Kids Angry: The hoax of black victimization and those who enable it.
His work has appeared in more than 1000 news sites around the world, including the New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Time Magazine. His story about how a black man was unjustly convicted of trying to kill his white girlfriend resulted in his release from state prison and was featured on Court TV, NPR, The Los Angeles Times and San Diego Union-Tribune.
He is also the author of White Girl Bleed a Lot: The Return of Racial Violence to America and How the Media Ignore it.
Both books are about black mob violence, black on white crime and the Knockout Game — and how public officials, reporters and activists deny, excuse, condone and encourage them.
https://www.colinflaherty.com/
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 1:08:29 — 62.7MB) | Embed
Now who has organized, promoted and allowed blacks to be primitive beasts? Who has promoted Blacks to hate whites? Same group as usual.
Bill, dear God, man! Primitive beasts? That would be most of the drunk college-aged white people, I’ve ever met. And the Italians in the Catholic Church (behind the curtains of course). Please tell me you are not Italian American.
Marie, if it’s OK for you to broadbrush whole classes of largely decent White people as ‘primitive beasts’ why is it wrong to use that term for the particular Black people who really are primitive beasts? Does your anti-‘racism’ objectively discriminate by race, being specifically anti-White – just like essentially all anti-‘racism’?
Youtube banned Colin’s channel … again.
Another great interview. It made me recall when I hit the sidewalk after a nasty upside the head fist welcome in South Philly.
Colin cleverly moved his you tube.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEbta5E_jqlZmEJsriTEtnw
Jan – I’ve learned enough from you (and Trivium) to observe and know when I’m being manipulated.
That was the feeling I had listening to Colin reading his book and discussing “racial violence”.
I heard no balance at all. I heard a lot of trigger words and inflammatory language.
When a discussion doesn’t present any attempt of balance or acknowledgement of another experience or truth – I suspect an agenda of divisiveness.
Hmmm, I don’t recall any inflammatory language. Do you have quotes or examples? Did you study his work, read his book? Maybe there’s an agenda, but did you find it and present it? What’s the agenda? Is this really going on? Did you verify any of the material? Thank you for your feedback.
Gayle, I wonder if you mentioned a debt to Jan Irvin and the trivium in order to manipulate? If you had been influenced by shows here to think critically you probably wouldn’t have talked about your feelings on listening to this show, but rather as JI requested in the follow-up question, you would have talked about errors presented, other evidence not included and so on.
But then you also wanted ‘balance’ – and when it comes to interracial violence in the US, there just isn’t any balance.
https://www.amren.com/the-color-of-crime/
Black sociologist Carol M. Swain was honest when she reviewed Color of Crime and said that if the reality of Black/White interracial crime were reversed there would be a national controversy.
International news reporters for major newspapers have even admitted as much, going back twenty years: http://whitenationalism.com/ot/ot-06.htm
Do White lives matter, Gayle?