This episode is an interview with Mark Passio, pt. 4 titled “Balancing the Sacred Feminine and Masculine and Exposing New Age Bullshit” and is being released on Sunday, September 08, 2013. This interview with Mark was recorded Friday, August 30, 2013.
Mark Passio is an independent researcher, public speaker, radio talk show host, conference organizer and freedom activist from Philadelphia, PA. Mark has undertaken the task of assembling vast amounts of research in the areas of metaphysics, occultism, spirituality, symbology and consciousness studies. In 2007, Mark began presenting this information in the form of a presentation series entitled What On Earth Is Happening, with the intention of bringing the implications of this body of knowledge to greater public awareness. Mark launched his own web site in 2008 at:
http://www.WhatOnEarthIsHappening.com.
In 2010, Mark began hosting his own weekly internet radio show, also called What On Earth Is Happening, which continues today in the form of a podcast on Mark's website. Mark is also one of the co-hosts of Free Your Mind, http://www.FreeYourMindConference.com, the Philadelphia-based conference on consciousness, mind control and the occult. Over the years, Mark has worked closely with activist groups in his area such as the Tesla Science Foundation, Truth, Freedom, Prosperity and Survive & Thrive Philadelphia. Mark's latest endeavor is teaching an intensive seminar called Natural Law: The Real Law Of Attraction & How To Apply It In Your Life.
Visit Mark’s web site at:
http://www.whatonearthishappening.com
http://www.freeyourmindconference.com
This interview on Youtube:
Mark’s entire presentation, “New” Age Bullshit and the Suppression of the Sacred Masculine:
Donations. This episode is brought to you by:
Aaron
Ivo
Thomas
This interview AUDIO ONLY:
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 1:42:55 — 59.0MB) | Embed
Great interview.
Thanks
Always enjoy listenining to Mark. I have forwarded it on.
Thanks
Very informative podcast, plenty of interesting subjects, but lets not keep mystifying this quantum thing by further obscuring (occulting) its physical significance. Quantum science IS tangible in the real world and is applied to engineering processes that yield real results. Unfortunately this is something that is also lost on the new-agers.
How is this? (being rhetorical here) – the applicable science and engineering of quantum mechanics is based on empirical/statistical data. Quantum science (as applied) is not practiced on the basis of the understanding of its physical underpinning. Ironically the scientists responsible for this conundrum were unable to postulate a successful physical model, risked looking foolish and by consensus agreed to its further manipulation via statistical methods, basically smoothing over a huge gap by peddling it as something paradoxical (Einstein confessed as much by admitting, “god does not play dice”).
It is essentially a very high-tech empirical science, lacking ‘concrete’ theory. Perhaps this is the reason some call it ‘magical’, unfortunately sounding as if amazed by their own ignorance while still pleased with the results, and lets be honest, that is really the essence of referring to it as ‘magical’. It’s the equivalent of finding a genie’s lamp, giving it a couple rubs and presto, magic! SHH just don’t tell anyone that we don’t have a clue how it works, but we know it works.
I think what is being claimed here is that, Quantum Mechanics is based on theory. It’s hardly testable by the common person so it needs a certain amount of faith. Do you call that science?
The premise of all things based on QM is also a theory.
And another problem was that QM was corrupted by Prussian “philosophy” if u want to call it that.
Somewhere between Newtons Causality and Einsteins theory’s, men lost their rationality as to what science was indented to accomplish.
Sorry I meant our fundamental approach to science was corrupted by nazi- er- um Prussian “philosophy”
Where’s the edit button?
You guys mention how some people are devout skeptics and there are others who believe all they hear. It seems the common link between these opposite ends of the spectrum is that in both cases the person is not processing or thinking about the information they encounter in the world.
About the 40- 47 minute mark: Huxley again revealed his CIA ties. The CIA learned, from Russia, that barbiturates could be used as a “truth serum.” Russia used these drugs to “break” prisoners and gather from them intelligence secrets, or obtain very real confessions of guilt. Due to the successes of early experimentation with barbiturates in the U.S., the MK Ultra crew were ecstatic about the possibilities for using for many purposes, as averred by Huxley.
I learned a lot of this from watching the Wizard of Oz. The original film, not Passios presentation. Almost every different form of mystery wisdom is presented in that film, and the use and ab- use of them pretty obvious. I mean, not at 9 years old, but now.
The Wizard of Oz has been called “Americas favorite movie”. So you can’t say we haven’t been exposed to the truth.
The “three roads” converge right when Dorothy meets the Scarecrow. I think they take the middle path together but I can’t recall exactly.
There is no doubt that some people have a “dominant” side of their brain, as they also have a dominant hand or dominant eye; people are asymmetrical in every sense. What study’s have shown is that no single side of the brain controls creativity or logic alone. Study’s, along with much more research [if you take the time to look it up], shows that the brain in it’s entirety controls all types of functions. Attributes are not just located on a certain side of the brain, they are found everywhere with different connections. From what I have gathered: the more overall neural connections you have in your brain, the more creative or intelligent you can be. There for Mark’s premise of the Left/Right brain is false! Don’t get me wrong i agree with most of Passio’s msg but it doesn’t mean what he presents is true.
You’re missing the entire point.
Do you mind elaborating? I don’t mean to be a pest, just trying to weed things out.
You’re focused on scientific terms rather than the concepts being relayed. It’s causing you to miss the larger picture.
Hi Jan, I hope you see this comment and have time for a quick reply.
I just re-watched this interview to hear the part about you declining an invitation to speak at FYM2 again, as I have come to the same general conclusion you stated about those three individuals being part of the disinformation agenda.
Did you ever make that presentation? I’d like to direct people who ask me about them to it.
(Edit out this line if you don’t want it public, but I hypothesize that the 3 you were referring to were Webre, Bassagio & Eisenhower, so a single presentation that handles all 3 of them at once would be great to have available.)
Thanks,
Cameron