UnSpun 061 – Transgenda: Transgender and Modern Eugenics

Share

Jan and Joe discuss the promotion of transgender and the gay agenda, including unisex bathrooms as part of the modern eugenics program against Americans and the world.

  7 comments for “UnSpun 061 – Transgenda: Transgender and Modern Eugenics

  1. carl hassell
    March 21, 2017 at 7:20 pm

    A real fine show covering the agenda of moving us towards transgender, or modern eugenics. There was talk of Pan again on the show, and he was also used early on at the promo for the Monterey Pop Festival. Both as a Stage Banner, and as the image on the CD. He can also be seen on the front of the stage in the film. https://images.991.com/large_image/Jimi+Hendrix+Monterey+International+Pop+Fes-528415.jpg https://howlateitwas.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/empty.jpg

  2. carl hassell
    March 21, 2017 at 7:36 pm

    It would be nice if the audience participated a bit more. I could do 2 hours, but the ambiguous, and nonsense comments, and the terrible spelling has me questioning some people’s commitment to these topics. It is very distracting and not needed by anyone, it cheapens the discourse. But J&J keep straight ahead, and THAT is a good thing. Thanks to both of you for your time & efforts.

  3. carl hassell
    March 21, 2017 at 7:57 pm

    Quotes About Progress

    Quotes tagged as “progress” (showing 1-30 of 823)

    Frank Zappa
    “Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.”
    ― Frank Zappa

    tags: music, philosophy, progress

  4. John Cokos
    March 22, 2017 at 5:18 pm

    Joe’s observations about Theodor W. Adorno and the Beatles are something that I looked into a decade or so as I had a family member who was an executive secretary at Columbia Records. I was able to gain some insight into this, and although there is no direct evidence to support his authorship of the Beatles music, the key to the mystery lies in the OWNERSHIP OF THE MUSIC RIGHTS.
    I sent Joe an email on another topic and never got a response, so I won’t go into the rabbit hole of detail’s around this.
    Who is Carl Hassell and who appointed him the arbitrator of who and what should get said on this blog ?

    • carl hassell
      March 22, 2017 at 7:13 pm

      John Cokos, nobody made me an arbitrator. Check your dictionary again. My opinion was based on following the show live. Deal with it. LOL.

  5. seu bobo
    March 24, 2017 at 11:51 am

    we’re told by the absurd narrative that erasmus darwin taught us to say pangenesis; his grandson would run apeshit with the notion of course…

    “In 1889, De Vries published his book Intracellular Pangenesis,[4] in which, based on a modified version of Charles Darwin’s theory of Pangenesis of 1868, he postulated that different characters have different hereditary carriers. He specifically postulated that inheritance of specific traits in organisms comes in particles. He called these units pangenes, a term 20 years later to be shortened to genes by Wilhelm Johannsen.”
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangenesis

    …darwin’s cousin, francis galton, would take issue cause he was a narrative device of course. francis taught us say “eugenics”. gregor(y) bateson’s old man would also take issue with chuck, william bateson taught us to say “genetics” by the feckinway. bateson was mendel’s bulldog in a dialectical pretense with galton’s biometric school. the issue would be resolved with probablistic bullpsience from the likes of ra fisher and jbs haldane, jbs fuckin haldane. haldane’s sister, naomi, was even crazier though, butwhatever…

    “Mendel’s findings allowed scientists such as Fisher and J.B.S. Haldane to predict the expression of traits on the basis of mathematical probabilities. An important aspect of Mendel’s success can be traced to his decision to start his crosses only with plants he demonstrated were true-breeding. He also only measured absolute (binary) characteristics, such as color, shape, and position of the seeds, rather than quantitatively variable characteristics. He expressed his results numerically and subjected them to statistical analysis. His method of data analysis and his large sample size gave credibility to his data. He also had the foresight to follow several successive generations (F2, F3) of pea plants and record their variations. Finally, he performed “test crosses” (backcrossing descendants of the initial hybridization to the initial true-breeding lines) to reveal the presence and proportions of recessive characters. Without his diligence and careful attention to procedure and detail, Mendel’s work would have had a much smaller impact on the world of genetics.”
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_de_Vries

    …the gene particle hustle is just as silly as the atomic particle hustle. heinz von foester, wittgenstein’s nephew and the father of second order cybernetics, once let slip the hustle…

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2KnPBg-tanE&ebc=ANyPxKpqD_PiKEVb2s_TxlrFpNnuCP46aUeEpbEjS1F_rZLRgKRLXu-s6mubHaiYQAxJJ2BB8dBz

    galton’s biometrika bullpsience also gave us the g factor statistical nonsense called the iq test that the japanese are apparently so good at. google monster terman iq test and eugenics. enjoy…

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Terman

    …your phi beta kappa (the kappa is for kybernetes) types will never see thru the hustle cause a pride…

    http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=cybernetics

    • March 24, 2017 at 6:15 pm

      Exactly right. Have you checked out these guys in the Brain database? John BS Haldane influenced Terence McKenna, WE have De Vries, Bateson, the Darwins, et al. Ironically or not, Thomas Huxley was Darwin’s propaganda manager, and then Aldous is the MKULTRA architect for the CIA with Julian running the more direct eugenics over at Princeton.

      Great find. Thanks for sharing!

Leave a Reply