An Interview with Freeman Burt and Dr. Tom – “How to Research: Case Study – Cannabis” – #191

Share

GM_191_draft3

Today Tom and Freeman Burt join the Gnostic Media podcast again to discuss “How to Research: Case Study – Cannabis”. This episode is being released on Sunday, February 25, 2014, and was recorded yesterday.

Both Dr. Tom and Freeman Burt have been on the Gnostic Media podcast a number of times, and for more information on them, see the Slaves Anonymous Section on the Gnositc media website, and also:

Burt’s Website: www.onlyfreemen.com
Dr. Tom’s website: http://www.boundaries-for-effective-ministry.org/

Documents used in this episode:

http://www.gnosticmedia.com/txtfiles/THE_VIOLATION.pdf
http://www.gnosticmedia.com/txtfiles/convention_1961_en.pdf

Music by Jesse Miller - Free Eddy Lepp, 2009.

My interview with Eddy Lepp (in the archives):
http://www.gnosticmedia.com/036-medical-marijuana-and-the-feds-an-interview-with-eddy-lepp/

Donations. This episode is brought to you by:

William
Ron
Tino
Jeremy
Tom
Jean
Paul
Alain
Casey
Peter
Michael
Nicholas
Paul J.
Louis
Carlos
Ian
Lee
John
None ATM
Robert
Randy
Aaron
Steve
M&A
Thomas
Jason
John
Charlotte
Sam
Steven
Oscar
Luis
Joseph
Samuel
Brandon
Barry
Scott
Philip
Deb
Mackinlay
Allen
Krister

  10 comments for “An Interview with Freeman Burt and Dr. Tom – “How to Research: Case Study – Cannabis” – #191

  1. el
    March 1, 2014 at 5:20 pm

    yep. when u sign your medical marijuana card (or any contract/permit with a fiction) with the State, you are basically saying “I’m a criminal and i intend to sell this weed. please check my premises often for compliance and tax my “medicine” heavily.”

    DONT GET PERMITS
    “permits”are licenses from the King to do something otherwise illegal. this is how you lose everytime in Court even tho u thought you were lawful….because you never found out what a permit was and what it meant.

  2. el
    March 1, 2014 at 5:26 pm

    the current lobbyists profit orgy focus, the ” Medical Marijuana Movement” is a perfect case in point of how easily people willingly give up freedom for the convenience of being able to drive around with an ounce and not be hassled by the cops.

  3. el
    March 1, 2014 at 5:33 pm

    if a weed goes legal in the forest, and theres no one family like the Kennedys to manage prohibition of production–
    does it make a profit?

  4. timothy engelskirchen
    March 1, 2014 at 9:34 pm

    On page 44, why isn’t the following information provided

    Cannabis Chemistry
    by Erowid

    NAME : Tetrahydrocannabinols
    CHEMICAL NAME : Tetrahydro-6,6,9-trimethyl-3-pentyl-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-1-ol
    CHEMICAL FORMULA C21H30O2
    MOLECULAR WEIGHT 314.47
    BOILING POINT 200°C (392°F)
    LD50 1270 mg/kg (male rats), 730 mg/kg (female rats) oral in sesame oil
    LD50 42 mg/kg (rats) inhalation
    From the Merck Index 12th Edition

  5. timothy engelskirchen
    March 1, 2014 at 9:35 pm

    as well as
    NAME : Cannabinol
    CHEMICAL NAME : 6,6,9-Trimethyl-3-pentyl-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-1-ol
    ALTERNATE CHEMICAL NAMES : 3-amyl-1-hydroxy-6,6,9-trimethyl-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran
    CHEMICAL FORMULA C21H26O2
    MOLECULAR WEIGHT 310.44
    From the Merck Index 12th Edition

  6. forky
    March 2, 2014 at 9:00 pm

    Love the topic, thanks.

    I enjoy the shows that feature Freeman Burt but I think sometimes he comes across a little shaky. I didn’t come around here to nitpick so I hope I’m adding something constructive to your efforts.

    About 12 minutes into the talk, Burt talks about “shared jurisdiction” between fed and state government. In constitutional terms I don’t think this exists. You can’t have exclusive limitations of government and then have “shared” authority. One entity is either in charge or it isn’t.

    Article 1 is clear in its original explanation of federal jurisdiction – within ANY given State. Not to exceed 100 square miles (10×10) for any one State. EVERYTHING else falls under the authority of State jurisdiction.
    And here it is:

    Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17

    To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of Particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;–

    Thanks,

    Forky

    • el
      March 10, 2014 at 9:37 am

      A lot of confusion around what a Federal Enclave is, how it’s developed, And implemented in your State. Look into Federal Enclaves such as National Forests, Ranger Stations, and National Parks and you will find some have been voted By an Act of Congress ASSEMBLED. The Majority of said Federal Enclaves are created with only an Act of Congress, a less powerful CLAIM of Authority….if so, it’s up to the Natural Man to point that out, and then the Natural Man can claim Jurisdiction of Authority….

      Just to be on the same page here, “authority” is absolute power

      “Jurisdiction” is the right to have authority to speak.

      Every authority has a source, and you need to know and identify that source of power before you dabble in Legal Land.

Leave a Reply